Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: Possible Saddam-Al Qaeda Link

  1. #1
    [u][b]Possible Saddam-Al Qaeda Link Seen in U.N. Oil-for-Food Program[/b][/u]

    Friday, September 17, 2004

    By Claudia Rosett and George Russell

    LUGANO, Switzerland — Did Saddam Hussein use any of his ill-gotten billions filched from the United Nations oil-for-food program to help fund Al Qaeda?

    Investigations have shown that the former Iraqi dictator grafted and smuggled more than $10 billion from the program that for seven years prior to Saddam's overthrow was meant to bring humanitarian aid to ordinary Iraqis. And the Sept. 11 Commission has shown a tracery of contacts between Saddam and Al Qaeda (search) that continued after billions of oil-for-food dollars began pouring into Saddam's coffers and Usama bin Laden (search) declared his famous war on the U.S.

    Now, buried in some of the United Nation's own confidential documents, clues can be seen that underscore the possibility of just such a Saddam-Al Qaeda link — clues leading to a locked door in this Swiss lakeside resort. (To review a series of documents, audits and other stories related to oil-for-food, click here.)

    Next to that door, a festive sign spells out in gold letters under a green flag that this is the office of MIGA, the Malaysian Swiss Gulf and African Chamber (search). Registered here 20 years ago as a society to promote business between the Gulf States and Asia, Europe and Africa, MIGA is a company that the United Nations and the U.S. government says has served as a hub of Al Qaeda finance: A terrorist chamber of commerce.

    In a recent interview, U.S. Assistant Treasury Secretary Juan Zarate described MIGA as "a very good example of an investment company that is used as a shell to hide and move money."

    [Editor's Note: This is the first in a series of articles about the U.N. oil-for-food program. Check back Sunday for the next installment and watch FOX's "Boiling Point" on Sunday at 9 p.m. EDT for an hour-long special on the oil-for-food program.]

    As is typical of terrorist financial webs, the details surrounding MIGA quickly become bewildering — part of the point being to camouflage the illicit flow of funds with legitimate business. Part of the problem in finding the truth is that cross-border transactions out of such financial havens as Switzerland are smothered in banking secrecy.

    But even with that secrecy — and shortly after the Sept.11, 2001, attacks on the United States — both MIGA and its chief founder and longtime president, Ahmed Idris Nasreddin, landed on the U.N. watchlist of entities and individuals belonging to, or affiliated with Al Qaeda.

    Nasreddin is a member of the terror-linked Muslim Brotherhood (search).

    Nasreddin's longtime business partner, Egyptian-born Youssef Nada, also of the Muslim Brotherhood, likewise appears on the U.N.'s Al Qaeda watchlist, as do a slew of both Nasreddin's and Nada's enterprises. Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill in August 2002 described Nada and Nasreddin as "supporters of terrorism" involved in "an extensive financial network providing support to Al Qaeda and other terrorist-related organizations."

    Far less attention has been paid to the small, select band of MIGA's other charter members. But one of them, Iraqi-born Ahmed Totonji, set up shop years ago just outside Washington, D.C., and is now under investigation in the United States on suspicion of having funneled money to Al Qaeda from Islamic charities based in Herndon, Va. All those named here have denied these allegations.

    MIGA had other founders as well. One of them, who does not appear on the U.N. terror list, is an Arab businessman now in his early 60s, Abdul Rahman Hayel Saeed.

    Described by an acquaintance as urbane, polite and fluent in English, Hayel Saeed was born into one of Yemen's most prominent business clans, owners of a family-held global conglomerate based in the Yemeni capital of Taiz and named for its founding patriarch: the Hayel Saeed Anam Group of Companies, or HSA.

    From Yemen, the HSA Group (search) boasts a far-flung business empire, including a Yemen-based Islamic bank, and a host of business subsidiaries, affiliates and regional trading offices in places ranging from the United Kingdom to Egypt, Morocco, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Malaysia, Indonesia, Russia and China.

    Abdul Rahman Hayel Saeed sits on the HSA board of directors, and ranks high in the management — he is currently running HSA's regional office in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. In MIGA, Hayel Saeed holds a prominent spot, as one of four co-founders who back in 1984 delegated power of attorney to the terrorist-linked Nasreddin, giving him authority to run the company.

    Swiss registry documents show that Hayel Saeed has never resigned from MIGA, nor revoked that power of attorney. Queried about this link to MIGA, neither Hayel Saeed nor the HSA Group's chairman of the board, Ali Mohammed Saeed, has made any response.

    HSA is unquestionably a company involved in legitimate business. But given the involvement of Abdul Rahman Hayel Saeed, it is striking that between 1996 and 2003, while the United Nations ran its oil-for-food relief program in Iraq, the HSA Group — via U.N.-approved oil-for-food contracts — sold at least $400 million worth of goods to Saddam.

    That might be unremarkable, had the United Nations ran oil-for-food with enough integrity and transparency to prevent Saddam and many of his business partners from plundering oil earnings meant to help the people of Iraq. The original United Nations plan was to let Saddam sell oil solely to buy humanitarian goods such as food and medicine, with the U.N. Secretariat (search) collecting a 2.2 percent commission on Saddam's oil sales to supervise the integrity of this process.

    As the oil-for-food program actually worked, however, the United Nations let Saddam choose his own business partners. The world body also kept secret the details of those contracts and the identities of the contractors, and it let Saddam graft at least $4.4 billion out of the program through manipulated contract prices, by estimates of the U.S. General Accountability Office.

    Saddam's standard scam was to underprice oil sales and overpay for relief supplies, thus generating fat profits for his business partners. Many of those contractors would kick back part of the take to Saddam's regime — or divert it to whatever uses Saddam might fancy. By various accounts, those uses ranged from building palaces to buying arms to supplying Saddam's sadistic son Uday with equipment for torturing Iraqi athletes.

    One of the big questions is whether any of the money skimmed from oil-for-food also slopped into terrorist-financing ventures such as MIGA.

    It's important to note that in tracking terrorist financing, the simplest starting points are the visible links, the potential connections through which money might most easily have flowed. Proving that funds actually coursed through those conduits is far more difficult.

    In the case of Hayel Saeed, MIGA and the HSA Group, there is no public information available about the precise flow of funds, and no proof that Saddam's money made its way to MIGA. But in looking for patterns that beg for further investigation — especially by authorities with access to detailed U.N. records and information on MIGA accounts — some items here stand out.

    Most simply, there is the question of why HSA was among those companies favored by Saddam for such a fat slice of business. It is increasingly clear that Saddam did not, on average, choose his contractors either at random, or because they were the most cost-efficient suppliers of relief for the people of Iraq. While some of the deals may have been entirely legitimate, many melded payments for humanitarian goods with illicit kickbacks and payoffs. In such cases, it was a lucrative privilege to be tapped as an oil-for-food contractor by Saddam's regime.

    The lingering question, for any individual case, becomes: Was there a quid pro quo?

    For reasons still unknown, Saddam clearly smiled upon the HSA Group. Not only does HSA account for the bulk of all Saddam's business with Yemen, but dozens of deals that appear in the United Nation's generic public records to originate elsewhere were in fact signed with HSA companies in countries such as Egypt, Malaysia and Indonesia.

    Within that HSA empire, one company in particular stands out: A trading house called Pacific Interlink, based in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Abdul Rahman Hayel Saeed also sits on Pacific Interlink's board of directors.

    From leaked copies of secret U.N. oil-for-food records, it appears that Pacific Interlink alone accounted for more than half the HSA Group's sales of relief supplies to Saddam, with contracts for such goods as soap, ghee and construction materials totaling at least $246 million. Pacific Interlink (search) also belonged to the select set of companies chosen by Saddam and approved by the United Nations as authorized to buy Iraqi oil under oil-for-food — though whether Pacific Interlink actually got any of Saddam's fat oil contracts is something the United Nations has so far managed to keep secret.

    And though there is no public proof that Pacific Interlink took part in Saddam's kickback scams, there is an intriguing item in a study of oil-for-food pricing methods released last year by the U.S. Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA). FOX News attempted to reach Pacific Interlink for comment.

    Just after Saddam fell, the DCMA, together with the U.S. Defense Contract Audit Agency, looked at the terms of 759 sample contracts out of the tens of thousands of deals done by Saddam's regime under oil-for-food. In that sample, Pacific Interlink pops up as a purveyor of $20 million worth of palm oil to Saddam, via a contract approved by the United Nations under oil-for-food in mid-2001. By DCMA estimates, Saddam overpaid Pacific Interlink on that contract, to the tune of about 15 percent above market price, which would work out to some $3 million in funds diverted from relief on that deal alone.

    If similar arrangements went on within other Pacific Interlink oil-for-food contracts, which totaled close to a quarter of a billion dollars, then even at the more modest rate of what has been widely described as Saddam's typical 10 percent over-pricing scam, that would suggest well over $20 million diverted from relief.

    If so, where did it go? The question is vitally important, because much of the money grafted out of oil-for-food by Saddam remains unaccounted for.

    Both HSA's and MIGA's offices overlap in locations that are hubs of normal commerce, but also served as hotspots of Al Qaeda meetings and finance, such as Dubai (where Hayel Saeed reportedly ran an HSA company, Frimex, in the late 1990s) or Kuala Lumpur (where some of the Sept. 11 hijackers gathered for a planning conference in January 2000). Pacific Interlink boasts offices or agents in places thick with terror networks, such as Algeria, Sudan, and Syria. MIGA, on its Lugano sign, lists offices in places such as Italy, Turkey, Syria, Nigeria and Kuwait, and both HSA and MIGA list offices in Morocco, Malaysia and Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, where Hayel Saeed is now based.

    MIGA is now the subject of active investigations in the United States, Switzerland and Italy. But there is no sign that any of these investigations have been tracking funds specifically via oil-for-food contracts or that any of the multiple investigations into oil-for-food have zeroed in on possible terror connections. It's not even clear that the United Nations has allowed terrorist-tracking authorities full access to its records.

    And though MIGA's door in Lugano may be locked, and its president and some of his associates posted on the U.N. terror watchlist, none of these figures has been arrested. Nasreddin, long a resident in Lugano and neighboring Milan, Italy, is believed by Italian investigators to have moved about two years ago to Morocco. From there, says an Italian state investigator, Nasreddin maintains a global business network that includes some 2,000 links so far identified to businesses and individuals worldwide, some tied to terror, and some not.

    It is precisely that mix of legitimate and sinister business that makes it so difficult to prosecute Nasreddin, or shut down his businesses, says this Italian investigator. Among Nasreddin's holdings, for instance, is a four-star hotel in Milan, Hotel NASCO, which opened — ironically enough — in September 2001, at the same address as Nasreddin's longtime residence. That is also the same address used by a precursor of MIGA, an outfit called the Arab Gulf Chamber. Hotel NASCO remains open for business, serving tea and crescent-moon shaped sugar cookies at its non-alcoholic lobby bar. MIGA remains active in the Lugano business registry, and listed in the Lugano phone book.

    A recent phone call to MIGA's shuttered office in Lugano, Switzerland, was answered by someone who picked up the phone in Milan, Italy — in the Hotel NASCO (search). MIGA's network, it seems, migrates as needed.

    Nasreddin's longtime partner, Al Qaeda-linked Youssef Nada, still lives in his plush hillside villa in a small Italian enclave on Lake Lugano, just a short drive from MIGA's office. Right next door to MIGA's Lugano office, on the same floor of the same building, is the Lugano Islamic Community Center, founded by Nasreddin in 1992 — and operated initially out of his former Lugano residence a few blocks away. The community center later moved next door to MIGA.

    Swiss registry documents show that in 2002, right around the time Nasreddin made it onto the U.N. terror watchlist and moved to Morocco, he resigned as president of his Lugano Islamic center. He was replaced this year by the center's current president, a man called Ali Ghaleb Himmat, who attended one of MIGA's founding meetings 20 years ago, and since 2002 has been designated by the United Nations as affiliated with, or belonging to Al Qaeda.

    At that Lugano Islamic Community Center (search), which also serves as a mosque, a spokesman denies that the center has any links to Al Qaeda, and says of Nasreddin: "He was a Muslim rich man, and he prays, and he loved God, and that's it." Just down the road, Swiss businessman Fulvio Passardi, who at one point served as corporate secretary for MIGA, says he knew nothing about the chamber, saying it was "an empty box."

    According to U.S. officials and the United Nations itself, MIGA is less an "empty box" than a container of Al Qaeda-related mysteries. One of those mysteries appears to be Abdul Rahman Hayel Saeed, with his charter MIGA membership and his prominent part in a Yemen conglomerate doing hundreds of millions worth of business with Saddam.

    Unraveling the mystery requires much greater access to Oil-for-Food records than the United Nations currently allows.

    ---Claudia Rosett is a consultant to FOX News and Journalist-in-Residence at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies.

    ---George Russell is a consultant for FOX News.

  2. #2
    Jets Insider VIP Legend
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    I just saw the is unbelievable anyone lends the UN any credibility at all.

  3. #3
    Jets Insider VIP Legend
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    More UN fodder:

    [b]UN accused of collaborating with Hezbollah [/b]

    Relatives of Beni Avraham, Adi Avitan and Omar Sawaed convene press conference ahead of filing civil suit against UN. Charge kidppings couldn’t have succeeded without UN assistance and active involvement.
    Anat Shihor-Aharonson

    The families of the three IDF soldiers kidnapped by Hezbollah have accused the United Nations of involvement in the abductions.

    “Today we can say with certainty that the UN was actively involved in the kidnappings of our sons”, the families of Beni Avraham, Adi Avitan and Omar Sawaed charged during a press conference they convened ahead of filing a civil suit against the UN in a US court, eight months after their bodies were returned to Israel for burial as part of the prisoner swap deal with Hezbollah.

    The families’ representatives argued that from analyzing the chain of events that led to the abductions, it is clear that a high level of cooperation existed between UNIFIL personnel and the Hezbollah. Without this assistance, they claim, the kidnappers would not have been able to obtain UN license plates and uniforms, which they used during the ambush and kidnappings.

    According to their statement, UNIFIL personnel were used as a diversion in order to draw the soldiers to the ambush point. It is also clear, they charge, that UN officers witnessed the abductions but did nothing in order to help the Israeli troops.

    The families charge that several hours after the kidnappings, UN soldiers located two vehicles six kilometers from the ambush point. In one car, several items were found including UN license plates, while in the other car the UN staff discovered large blood stains.

    In a highly unusual measure, as defined by the families, the UNIFIL staff, assisted by members of the UNTSO organization, took the items out of the cars, something that is strictly forbidden according to UN guidelines, took them to their base near Rosh Hanikra and eventually handed them over to the Hezbollah.

    Several days after the kidnappings, senior UN officials came to understand the high degree of sensitivity in the matter and instructed their subordinates to shred all photos and reports of the incident.

    According to Professor Shimon Sheetrit, who represents the families, the UN’s actions were illegal and contradict the entire structure on which the UN was established.

    The families also plan to sue Hezbollah for kidnapping the soldiers, in addition to Syria, Lebanon and Iran for supporting the Lebanese terror organization.
    Since the October 2000 abductions, Israel and the families have expressed outrage over the UN’s inability to prevent the kidnappings.

    In July 2001, it was revealed that UNIFIL soldiers filmed Hezbollah operatives as they were transferring the three IDF troops, about 18 hours after they were kidnapped, from a distance of barely 20 km from point of abduction.

    In addition, it became evident that several UN soldiers knew that the Lebanese terror group intends to kidnap IDF soldiers from the area of the Shaba Farms and had even been paid off by the Hezbollah in order to turn a blind eye.

    Israeli officials were also infuriated over the fact that the UN had hidden a tape that was filmed during the abduction and demanded of UN Secretary General Kofi Annan to use that tape in order to help determine the fate of the soldiers. Only after a long struggle, the UN allowed Israeli officials to view the tape, but only four times.

  4. #4
    money corrupts..this is not news...Kerry Has said He will not let The UN dictate Us policy..

    Money has corrupted the UN, Dick Cheney, everyone...
    the un supporting hizbollah is not shocking...
    The Sauds (bush's friends and US ally?) supports qeada, hamas, and hizbollah..
    it a f-ed up world!

  5. #5
    Don't be ridiculous Saddam was Santa Claus, he was just minding hs own business over in the sand.

  6. #6
    [quote][i]Originally posted by pope[/i]@Sep 17 2004, 10:25 AM
    [b] Don't be ridiculous Saddam was Santa Claus, he was just minding hs own business over in the sand. [/b][/quote]
    I always like 5Evers making cookies line. Classic.

  7. #7
    saddam was a saint compared to bin laden!

    the war was a mistake..face it.
    people are dying for no reason...

  8. #8
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    [quote][i]Originally posted by bman[/i]@Sep 17 2004, 09:35 AM
    [b] saddam was a saint compared to bin laden!

    the war was a mistake..face it.
    people are dying for no reason... [/b][/quote]
    That sounds oddly familiar, have you said that before?

  9. #9
    once or twice!

  10. #10
    [quote][i]Originally posted by bman[/i]@Sep 17 2004, 10:35 AM
    [b] saddam was a saint compared to bin laden!

    the war was a mistake..face it.
    people are dying for no reason... [/b][/quote]
    Yup, 50K/year in car accidents. Tell me, if your time was up next week, would you rather die in car accident for no reason or in Iraq helping the Iraqis?

    This doesn't even compare to other wars that the 'rats got us into.

  11. #11
    YOU THink we are helping the Iraquis!!

    are you high?

  12. #12
    [quote][i]Originally posted by bman[/i]@Sep 17 2004, 02:02 PM
    [b]YOU THink we are helping the Iraquis!

    are you high?
    Yes we are

    No I'm not

  13. #13
    [quote][i]Originally posted by asuusa+Sep 17 2004, 03:10 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>[b]QUOTE[/b] (asuusa @ Sep 17 2004, 03:10 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-bman[/i]@Sep 17 2004, 02:02 PM
    [b]YOU THink we are helping the Iraquis&#33;

    are you high?
    Yes we are

    No I&#39;m not [/b][/quote] seem familiar. Do you post here under a different name perhaps?? :blink:

  14. #14
    we were told that we went war because Saddam was IMMINENT Threat to the US..A LOT of people (including myself) didn&#39;t believe the bush admin. We thought there were other reasons.
    So now it&#39;s clear that Iraq was NOT an imminent threat to the US..nor did they ever attack us..
    60% of the iraqui people are shhiites who would rather have an Islamic Gov&#39;t..
    The US will not allow that to happen&#33; how are we helping the iraui people? we killed 30,000 of their civilians for no reason and turned the country into Hell on Earth..

  15. #15
    [quote][i]Originally posted by Darkstar Rising+Sep 17 2004, 03:15 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>[b]QUOTE[/b] (Darkstar Rising @ Sep 17 2004, 03:15 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> [quote]Originally posted by asuusa@Sep 17 2004, 03:10 PM
    [b] <!--QuoteBegin-bman[/i]@Sep 17 2004, 02:02 PM
    [b]YOU THink we are helping the Iraquis&#33;

    are you high?
    Yes we are

    No I&#39;m not [/b][/quote] seem familiar. Do you post here under a different name perhaps?? :blink: [/b][/quote]

  16. #16
    [quote][i]Originally posted by bman[/i]@Sep 17 2004, 03:17 PM
    [b]we were told that we went war because Saddam was IMMINENT Threat to the US..A LOT of people (including myself) didn&#39;t believe the bush admin. We thought there were other reasons.
    So now it&#39;s clear that Iraq was NOT an imminent threat to the US..nor did they ever attack us..
    Yer right-they didn&#39;t attack us, but neither did Germany, North Korea, North Vietnam, or Bosnia but we went to war with them and it was a &#39;rat president who did it every time.

    You liberals are really hillarious--

    Clinton spends 77 billion on war in Serbia--that&#39;s good
    Bush spends 87 billion in Iraq--that&#39;s bad

    Clinton imposes regime change in Serbia--that&#39;s good
    Bush imposes regime change in Iraq--that&#39;s bad

    Clinton says Saddam has nukes--that&#39;s good
    Bush says Saddam has nukes--that&#39;s bad

    Clinton calls for regime change in Iraq--that&#39;s good
    Bush imposes regime change in Iraq--that&#39;s bad

    Clinton&#39;s first three years&#39; inflation average is 2.6%--that&#39;s good
    Bush&#39;s first three year&#39;s is 1.9%--that&#39;s bad

    Clinton&#39;s first three years&#39; unemployment rate average is 6.2%--that&#39;s good
    Bush&#39;s first thee years&#39; rate is 5.5%--that&#39;s bad

    Clinton&#39;s first three years total of real gross domestic product is 23.4 trillion--that&#39;s good
    Bush&#39;s first thee years total is 30.3 trillion--that&#39;s bad

    Clinton&#39;s first three year total of real exports is 2.13 trillion--that&#39;s good
    Bush&#39;s first three years total is 3.09 trillion--that&#39;s bad

    Kerry says this is the worst economy since the depression--where was he when the peanut farmer was president? Unemployment reached 10% at one point and I bought a house and got a good deal on interest at 13+%. Is Kerry that ignorant or is he simply lying?

  17. #17
    who gives a rats ass about the Iraqi&#39;s?

  18. #18
    [quote][i]Originally posted by bman[/i]@Sep 17 2004, 02:02 PM
    [b]YOU THink we are helping the Iraquis&#33;&#33;

    May 7, 2004 -- THE last time I was in Iraq, I met with a delegation of graduate students from Baghdad&#39;s best universities. Two hours into the discussion, one student said something extraordinary to me. He likened us to "doctors" and Iraq to a "patient" who needed radical surgery: "You [Americans] have started the operation. We are on the operating table. You can&#39;t leave now. You&#39;ve got to finish," he pleaded.

    I let him know that the United States was committed to restoring Iraq to health and would stay through the period of convalescence.

    Read our accomplishments here:


  19. #19
    i mean are you f--king sh-tting me?

    helping the Iraqis???


    what have they EVER done for us to deserve such help? to deserve democracy fought for with the blood of American soldiers?&#33;

    f--k the Iraqis.

  20. #20
    [quote][i]Originally posted by bitonti[/i]@Sep 18 2004, 02:25 AM
    [b] i mean are you f--king sh-tting me?

    helping the Iraqis???


    what have they EVER done for us to deserve such help? to deserve democracy fought for with the blood of American soldiers?&#33;

    f--k the Iraqis. [/b][/quote]
    Not to worry . . . given that Iraq is in shambles and that countless civilians have died, the concept of help doesn&#39;t really apply here. Not to mention that whenever Bush talks about democracy and elections in Iraq, he&#39;s got that funny little smirk on his face.

    Come to think of it, he&#39;s got that same look when he talks about our "sound" economy, health care, education . . .


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Follow Us