Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Latest on trade rumors about Mets, Rockies, Tulo & CarGo

  1. #1
    All League
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    East of the Jordan, West of the Rock of Gibraltar
    Posts
    4,805

    Latest on trade rumors about Mets, Rockies, Tulo & CarGo

    http://metsblog.com/metsblog/latest-...es-tulo-cargo/

    To get often (and currently) injured Tulowitzki we would have to give up many young players AND pay him $129 million over 7 years. Seems like a high price to pay.

    If I were calling the shots...if we give up a lots of talent we get some help with the salary or if we eat the $18 million per year we part with fewer players.


    We should be talking to the Dodgers about their gaggle of overpaid and underachieving outfielders.

    Anyway the cheap a$$ Mets wont do anything.... Do the Yankees have the players to trade so they can land Tulowitzki?




    In the last few days, I’ve seen several reports indicating interest and a potential fit between the Mets and Rockies for either SS Troy Tulowitzki or OF Carlos Gonzalez.

    So far today, David Lennon (Newsday), Joel Sherman (New York Post) and Andy Martino (Daily News), among others (MLB Trade Rumors), have already chimed in.

    Here’s what I have learned talking with team insiders and friends in Colorado and Citi Field, as well as reporters and fans, all involved or following the story over the last week…

    Is there a match?

    The buzz in baseball this week says the Mets and Cardinals best fit Colorado’s needs.

    The Mets may prefer Tulowitzki, but I’m hearing Gonzalez is a far more likely target – not just because of the money, but because of how a deal could shake out…

    In a deal for Tulowitzki or Gonzalez, the Mets will be expected to give up some combination of Noah Syndergaard, Zack Wheeler, Jon Niese, Travis d’Arnaud, Kevin Plawecki, Brandon Nimmo, etc. Remember, the Rockies are not looking to start a long-term rebuilding process. Instead, they’d like to get players back who can help them win now, while freeing up money to help them reload for next season.

    It will cost more to get Tulowitzki than Gonzalez, CBSSports.com’s Jon Heyman said today (WFAN, July 29), which is probably why a deal for Gonzalez is seemingly more likely for the Mets than Tulowitzki right now.

    Is a deal possible?

    Tulowitzki is due about $129 million over the next seven seasons, while Gonzalez will earn $53 million the next three years. The Rockies want the best affordable, now-talent they can get, while also freeing up the most money. So, to get, say, Wheeler and d’Arnaud, and one or two top prospects, the Mets would probably want Colorado to pay a portion of Tulowitzki’s or Gonzalez’s contract.

    Naturally, the Mets would prefer to keep their guys. Nevertheless, the Mets can afford the contract and they have plenty of players that interest Colorado. Also, Gonzalez has less money due to him and will likely cost less talent in return. The thing is, I just don’t know that they’ll see eye-to-eye on who is worth what and when. We’ll see.

    How will things play out?

    I suspect the Rockies know Sandy Alderson’s position and, instead of Sandy making pitches, Colorado is running numbers, scouting reports and weighing deals with other teams. If something were to happen in the next 48 hours, which I doubt it will, I’d say the Mets are only capable of acquiring Gonzalez, who the Rockies seem open to moving at any time for the right deal. Tulowitzki is significantly more complicated than that.

    For starters, Tulowitzki can essentially dictate where he wants to go, lots of teams will be interested, he’s adored by Colorado fans and – if the Rockies change front offices – that’s only going to further complicate trading the face of their franchise. This is a big deal for that franchise, a far bigger deal than Gonzalez, and I just can’t see them rushing through it with a Thursday deadline.

    In short, based on what I’m hearing, I’d put a Tulowitzki-to-the-Mets outcome at 1 percent, and a CarGo-to-the-Mets outcome at around 25 percent…

  2. #2
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    891
    Quote Originally Posted by Buster View Post

    Anyway the cheap a$$ Mets wont do anything....
    Yep, most likely. I saw Alderson blathering about it on SNY. I like Alderson, but I think he's hamstrung by the Coupons.

    So, that being said, I get the feeling they're blowin' smoke my a$$ all the time now. "90 wins, playoffs, .500, yadayada"....gtfoh

  3. #3
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Chicagoland
    Posts
    5,748
    I would prefer to stay away from Tulo. He has only played 140+ games once since 2009 - I think he has missed over 200 games due to injury in the last 4 or 5 seasons. And, he is currently on the DL. So far this season he is hitting .417-14-35 at home and .257-7-17 on the road. Much greater differential this season than in past years, but he has consistently hit better at Coors Field than away.

    If we are going to give up young talent, lets not do it for a guy who can't stay on the field. No thanks.

  4. #4
    All League
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Parsippany, NJ
    Posts
    3,705
    Tulo for Synd, Plawecki, Montero and Nimmo - who says no?
    Tulo isn't overpaid. If he was a FA this year he'd get $5million more per year.
    Synd and Montero are just depth at this point. Harvey, Wheeler, Gee, Neise, deGrom & Colon is 6 for next year
    Plawecki is blocked by d'Arnaud
    Nimmo is still 2 or 3 years away.

    Assuming the Wilpons are willing to actually try to put a legit winning team and spend some $ a lineup of:
    Granderson
    Murphy
    Wright
    Tulo
    Duda
    d'Arnaud
    -some avg LF
    Lagares
    with that starting rotation would be a legit contender.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us